--- description: GitHub, avantajlarını ve dezavantajlarını keşfedin, ürün özelliklerini ve fiyatını öğrenin, kullanıcı yorumlarını ve incelemelerini okuyun. - Capterra Türkiye image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: GitHub Yorumları, Özellikleri ve Fiyatı - Capterra Türkiye --- Breadcrumb: [Ev](/) > [Uygulama Geliştirme Programları](/directory/30082/application-development/software) > [GitHub](/software/129067/github) # GitHub Canonical: https://www.capterra.web.tr/software/129067/github Page: 1 / 250\ İleri: [Next page](https://www.capterra.web.tr/software/129067/github?page=2) > Geliştirme ekiplerinin iş birliği yapmasını ve kodu gözden geçirmesini ve yönetmesini sağlayan yazılım. Windows, Mac ve mobil cihazlarla çalışır. > > Verdict: Rated **4.8/5** by 6206 users. Top-rated for **Tavsiye edilme olasılığı**. ----- ## Overview ### Kimler GitHub Kullanıyor? Hem küçük startup’lar hem de büyük işletmeler için yazılım geliştirme. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Toplam** | **4.8/5** | 6206 İncelemeler | | Kullanım Kolaylığı | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Müşteri Desteği | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Paranızın Karşılığı | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Özellikler | 4.7/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Tavsiye edilme olasılığı) | ## Satıcı hakkında - **Şirket**: Microsoft - **Location**: Redmond, ABD - **Founded**: 1975 ## Commercial Context - **Başlangıç Fiyatı**: $4,00 - **Pricing model**: (Free version available) (Ücretsiz Deneme) - **Target Audience**: Serbest Meslek, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web tabanlı, Mac (Masaüstü), Windows (Masaüstü), Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise), Android (Mobil), iPhone (Mobil), iPad (Mobil) - **Supported Languages**: İngilizce - **Available Countries**: Almanya, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri, Avustralya, Avusturya, Belarus, Belçika, Birleşik Krallık, Brezilya, Bulgaristan, Danimarka, Endonezya, Estonya, Finlandiya, Fransa, Güney Afrika, Güney Kore, Hindistan, Hollanda, Hırvatistan, Irak and 27 more ## Özellikler - Automated Testing - Bilet Yönetimi - Birikmiş İş Yönetimi - Depo Yönetimi - Dosya Paylaşımı - Entegre Geliştirme Ortamı - Grafik Kullanıcı Arayüzü - Görev Yönetimi - Görev İlerlemesi İzleme - Güvenlik Açığı Tarama - Hata Ayıklama - Hata İzleme - Hata/Sorun Yakalama - Kalite Güvencesi - Kilometre Taşı İzleme - Kod İnceleme - Mobil Uygulama - Pano - Proje Yönetimi - Raporlama/Proje İzleme - Real-Time Analytics - Sorun Yönetimi - Sorun İzleme - Sürekli Dağıtım - Sürekli Entegrasyon - Sürekli Teslim - Sürüm Denetimi - Sürüm Yönetimi - Uygulama Güvenliği - Yapılandırma Yönetimi - İzleme - İş Birliği Araçları - İş Birliğine Dayalı Geliştirme ## Integrations (15 total) - CircleCI - Docker - Git - Heroku - JIRA Service Management - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Pivotal Tracker - Slack - Trello - Vercel - Visual Studio Code ## Support Options - E-posta/Yardım Masası - SSS/Forum - Bilgi Tabanı ## Category - [Uygulama Geliştirme Programları](https://www.capterra.web.tr/directory/30082/application-development/software) ## İlgili Kategoriler - [Uygulama Geliştirme Programları](https://www.capterra.web.tr/directory/30082/application-development/software) - [Kaynak Kodu Yönetimi Yazılımı](https://www.capterra.web.tr/directory/31420/source-code-management/software) - [Kâr Amacı Gütmeyen Proje Yönetimi Yazılımı](https://www.capterra.web.tr/directory/32439/project-management-software-for-nonprofits/software) - [Proje Yönetim Uygulaması](https://www.capterra.web.tr/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [Sürekli Entegrasyon Aracı](https://www.capterra.web.tr/directory/31119/continuous-integration/software) ## Alternatifler 1. [Bitrix24](https://www.capterra.web.tr/software/113540/bitrix24) — 4.2/5 (1005 reviews) 2. [GitLab](https://www.capterra.web.tr/software/159806/gitlab) — 4.6/5 (1227 reviews) 3. [Airtable](https://www.capterra.web.tr/software/146652/airtable) — 4.6/5 (2244 reviews) 4. [Wrike](https://www.capterra.web.tr/software/76113/wrike) — 4.4/5 (3042 reviews) 5. [ClickUp](https://www.capterra.web.tr/software/158833/clickup) — 4.6/5 (4635 reviews) ## İncelemeler ### "Github is an Essential Developer Tool" — 5.0/5 > **Christopher** | *17 Ağustos 2026* | Bilgi Teknolojileri ve Hizmetleri | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Artılar**: Github is now the defacto standard for version control. Easy to use and works great\! I used to use BitBucket before Github, but the interface on Github is much better. > > **Eksileri**: Some of the recent pushes are more focused on bringing in money. I like when they pushed usage more. Developers would use the product forcing companies to buy into the project. That was a better model. > > A must have. Github has a lot of cool tools like pipelines, AI code editors, and other offerings that make this a must have tool for any modern developer. ----- ### "A solid tool for everyday development and collaboration" — 4.0/5 > **Manuel** | *12 Ağustos 2026* | Hastane ve Sağlık Hizmetleri | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Artılar**: The biggest thing for me is how easy it makes collaboration. I use it a lot for pull requests, code reviews, and keeping track of changes, and it all feels pretty straightforward. > > **Eksileri**: The UI can feel a little cluttered sometimes, especially when you’re jumping between repos, issues, and pull requests. Some features also take a bit of digging to find or understand at first. > > Overall, my experience with GitHub has been really positive. I use it pretty regularly for repos, pull requests, code reviews, and team collaboration, and it’s become a pretty essential part of my workflow. ----- ### "Paved the way for source control but is having trouble" — 3.0/5 > **Doğrulanmış Yorumcu** | *25 Ağustos 2026* | Eğitim Yönetimi | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Artılar**: Github is the easiest way to collaborate with code with a very generous free tier. It has been around for a while so the toolset and concepts are very mature at this stage. > > **Eksileri**: Recently the performance of Github has been incredibly spotty and quite poor overall. This diminishes the reliability of the tool and its reputation as a trusted company. ----- ### "Important platform for version control and CI/CD but expensive to scale" — 5.0/5 > **Ekpono** | *21 Eylül 2026* | Çeviri ve Lokalizasyon | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Artılar**: Hosting free github private repositories, CI/CD using Github Actions, code review by AI and teammates. Pull Request and commits. issue tracking and forking public repositories etc. Github is fast, reliable and makes managing different code branches across different projects really simple > > **Eksileri**: Subscription gets expensive once your team grows. You have to pay per seat. Downloading Github action log is not available. Switching copilot to be usage based instead of subscription base is terrible > > Githbu is really realiable and team collaboration is top tier. Github action for your CI/CD is the best in the industry. and everything version control is seamless. per seat gets expensive real fast when your team grows and recent update of changing co-pilot billing to be usage based also adds to the cost. ----- ### "Keeps it simple and polished" — 4.0/5 > **Ioannis** | *19 Ağustos 2026* | Eğlence | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Artılar**: No-nonsense UI - it is one of the few where I never got use out of the "Zapper" tool of uBlock Origin, as everything has its place. Very good documentation for all parts of GitHub. Strong integrations with just about everything that affects a software development lifecycle. Clear ways to interact with it through many forms, including a rich command line client. Also, a high number of developers are on it which is a great boon for open source projects. > > **Eksileri**: Data portability - the issue tracker is deliberately quite simple (and I don't think it should be made more complex) but after a certain point, does not scale to everyone's needs. It is hard to move off of GitHub, at least for tracking issues. The pull request review process is quite noisy and sometimes hard to get to grips with. For example, it's not clear that you need to "Submit" your review to actually propose changes. The propose changes feature is very nice as it means you don't have to leave your browser, but is not very clearly exposed in the UI. Some social elements are undesirable, like "Achievements", which lead to drive-by interactions with open source projects. Their users are "in GitHub", but not "in projects" so to speak. I believe this creates poor incentives for the open source community, as it brings people further apart from becoming long term contributors, as they are chasing virtual badges instead of real community engagement. > > Positive - it has historically and I would say it is still one of the best when it comes to keeping it simple. They have been conservative with adding features and I believe that's the right approach on the whole. ----- Page: 1 / 250\ İleri: [Next page](https://www.capterra.web.tr/software/129067/github?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.web.tr/software/129067/github) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | ko | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | tr | | ----- ## Structured Data